YouTube Blog

March 09, 2009  |  Posted by: Patrick Walker  |  Permalink

YouTube, the UK and the Performing Rights Society for Music

We have invested a lot of time and effort trying to ensure that our community can find and enjoy the music they love, and we have strong partnerships with three of the four largest record labels in the world, as well as many independent labels. But copyrights in music can get pretty complicated. For example, there may be several different copyrights in a single music video, controlled by different organizations with different interests. The visual elements and the sound recording of a music video are typically owned by a record label, while the music and lyrics of the song being performed are owned separately by one or more music publishers. These publishers often designate organizations called collecting societies to issue licenses and collect royalties on their behalf. In the UK we've had a license from the collecting society called PRS for Music to make music videos provided by our record label partners available to our users in the UK.

Our previous license from PRS for Music has expired, and we've been unable so far to come to an agreement to renew it on terms that are economically sustainable for us. There are two obstacles in these negotiations: prohibitive licensing fees and lack of transparency. We value the creativity of musicians and songwriters and have worked hard with rights-holders to generate significant online revenue for them and to respect copyright. But PRS is now asking us to pay many, many times more for our license than before. The costs are simply prohibitive for us -- under PRS's proposed terms we would lose significant amounts of money with every playback. In addition, PRS is unwilling to tell us what songs are included in the license they can provide so that we can identify those works on YouTube -- that's like asking a consumer to buy an unmarked CD without knowing what musicians are on it.

We're still working with PRS for Music in an effort to reach mutually acceptable terms for a new license, but until we do so we will be blocking premium music videos in the UK that have been supplied or claimed by record labels. This was a painful decision, and we know the significant disappointment it will cause within the UK. And to be clear, this is not an issue with the record labels, with most of whom we have strong relationships.

While negotiations continue, we'll still be working to create more ways to compensate musicians and other rights-holders on YouTube. In addition to various advertising options, we recently introduced a click-to-buy feature that enables fans to purchase downloads of their favorite songs. We're also proud of our Content ID tools that help rights owners identify their content and even use the power of our community to increase advertising and revenue potential.

We will continue to seek partnerships that benefit our community, music publishers, music labels and, of course, musicians and songwriters, and we will work hard with anybody who shares this commitment. We hope that professional music videos will soon be back on YouTube for our users in the UK to enjoy, and if and when that time comes, you can be sure that you'll be the first to know.

Yours,
Patrick Walker
Director of Video Partnerships, Europe, Middle East and Africa


Sign in to comment on this post.

Comments

IfUSeekBrit (8 hours ago)
please i live in Greece and i can't see anything! PLEASE! FIX THIS!
madmax741992 (9 hours ago)
audioswap is bullshit, how do you expect it to be legit if it doesnt even have kanye west on it. like come on now, is that serious?
randalljf (10 hours ago)
This is awesome! Thank you so much for sticking it to the PRS, YouTube! Record companies need to realize how much you're doing for them and that they need to adapt their business models for the changing times. Long live YouTube!
posttronics (11 hours ago)
I just had to unsubscribe to a number of channels because of restictions. These record companies don't want British/European fans buying their music nor watch videos. They have done us a great favour by cutting out a mass market; therfore we get to save our money, and they lose. Why should we buy their stuff when they kick us in the face!
sphericthor (12 hours ago)
Sort it out YouTube!!! This issue should've been dealt with long before now but instead you let it get this far. When did the negotiations begin with PRS? Surely it couldn't have just been in the past few days and due to the greed by both organizations we are being punished just because of where we live. Your final comment of "IF and when that time comes" pretty much says that the UK can forget about listening to the music they want while the rest of the world can happily enjoy it.
sa3305 (14 hours ago)
Oh the PRS, we have had threatening letters about fines and court etc etc, theres scum running riot on the streets , drug dealers move in and out of the area, kids driving cars like twats and killing people ,,,,,, whats done ,,,nothing unless , like me, you play a radio at work thats listened to by TWO people, i must the worst criminal in the UK. Oh yea if you play a car radio and a friend hears it YOU ARE BREAKING THEIR RULES-PAY YOUR LICENSE or they will back date it 6 years...
davejarvis (17 hours ago)
Not directed at you mxeditor by the way
davejarvis (17 hours ago)
So tell me what you know then - go on i'm all ears? do you play the recorder or something? The truth is its people like you who 'think' they are a cut above the rest because they may know a little of a certain industry - hoo-bloody-ra for you. I dont like Leona btw i'm a bit old for that sort of music.
mxeditor (17 hours ago)
It's the same old song and dance. Record companies think they are entitled to fly in private jtes, eat caviar and never bring down the price of a CD. They could have embraced music downloading and file sharing, but NO....they had to cling to the old CD model until they were forced to join the online revolution. They have been overcharging us to fund their lavish lifestyles while ripping off the artists as well! Artists should have their agents deal directly with YouTube!! Ihope they choke on the fact they are losing revenue by the minute - get real record companies - the wild gluttony is over.
listenup55555 (17 hours ago)
davejarvis - I said "some people are ignorant" not "everyone". But, I include you now in that "some people" bracket. You're right, you don't know as much about the music industry as me, and you don't know how PRS does business either. I find it ironic that people stick up for a global corporation they know nothing about and who honestly doesn't care about anything other than a bottom line profit. There are other sites out there that offer music to consumers but pay the going rate to agencies like PRS because they realise music isn't free and writers deserve to get paid. I suggest you get your Leona Lewis clips from them whilst Google sort their act out.
davejarvis (20 hours ago)
listenup55555, Stop sticking yourself on a pedestal telling everyone else that they know nothing and your in the music industry blah, blah i've heard it all before. I accept that i wont know as much as you but what i do know is the PRS are a bunch of jumped up bullies and i'm sooooo glad someone like Google told them to go forth and multiply. if Google is such a big bad and nasty corporation then why the f**k dont you protest and stop using its services.
cathalj1988 (22 hours ago)
i think that this is all a big mess now n it pisses me off! ive now moved to a different site for music vids.. www.muzu.tv it looks out for the artist n is jst as easy to use!
listenup55555 (22 hours ago)
Some people on here are really ignorant and don't know all the facts involved with this. First of all, Youtube are owned by Google - one of THE BIGGEST global corporations in the world worth billions of dollars and who are looking to increase their global domination by buying sites like Youtube (for $1.65billion!!!) to make even more money. THEY DO NOT CARE about breaking new artists. If those artists don't make them money, they give a toss. Secondly, they have ONLY TAKEN DOWN 1% of the music videos from their site because of the dispute. 1% PEOPLE!!!!! And, guess what, it happens to be the most popular music in the charts because that will get them the most press coverage. Search for your obscure of less well known artists and THEY ARE STILL SHOWING 99% OF THE MUSIC they were last week. Thirdly, PRS is a NON FOR PROFIT company. THEY DO NOT MAKE A PROFIT. They pass EVERY SINGLE PENNY THEY MAKE (after costs) BACK TO MUSIC WRITERS. Without money, musicians and composers cannot afford to make music because they would have spend their time working in a real job making money rather than by writing music. So wake up and smell the coffee and work out who is running the show here. This is one big PR stunt to put pressure on PRS to charge it less licence fees which, ultimately means, musicians and writers get less. All Google care about is proctecting their profits. End of.
DarthVapour08 (1 day ago)
The thing is the PRS have really shot themselves in the foot here and harmed the artists they want to protect. Times change, for years we have been ripped off for CD's now at long last we can legally download music cheaply. If i see a video on You Tube i'll save it and more often then not if i wish to download it i pay for it on I-Tunes - because i've heard it first on You Tube i've decided to make a purchase where the artist benefits - so who is losing out now.
TackyRackyComixNEO (1 day ago)
I'm not from the U.K. (I'm from the U.S.), but I for sure can sympathize. And I certainly agree with the many who said that music on YouTube has actually influenced purchasing decisions in regard to buying CDs (as in an actual disc) or songs from iTunes, Amazon, etc. Allowing people to hear your music is the only way to promote it. I perfectly understand YouTube's stance on this subject. If PRS wants this to happen, then let them. Based on what I've read in the comments, they sound like they have a good mission but go about it illogically (like, someone who would go into a coffee shop while "Imagine" is playing on the radio and saying that John Lennon [may he rest in peace] wants his money).
nonamesavailabe (1 day ago)
Ha Ha Ha Ha AntismashX, You want all musicians/songwriters to work for free? That's about the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard- you want doctors and teachers and policemen to work for free too? You want to work for free yourself?? Im so sick of you idiots with no idea how the music industry works saying everything should be free! Why? Cause you dont want to pay it?? You think you should get free food too? and free clothes? and a free car? Cant you see how embarrasingly childish your argument is? If no-one pays for music there will be NO NEW MUSIC. It's as simpe as that. And all the bands you love to download for free won't exist anymore because they will have to get dayjobs to pay their bills. Oh, and chuck32ps- PRS are a non-profit organisation you retard. They are just trying to get musicians paid by the people exploiting their work. Google are one of the richest companies in the world. Who's greedy again?
BornToWatchTV (1 day ago)
i'm always scared to comment on youtube blogs and channel so that i wont get my account disabled. who else feels so?
chuck32ps (1 day ago)
the prs are a shower of greedy cunt faced pricks,
ClaireyThePinkFairy (1 day ago)
This really p-s me off. i love fidnign new stars who i have never heard of and now that wont be possible. y do say muscians ofn you tueb (i am willign to pay a small fee sum may not) assist you tueb by settin up montly/yearly fee to help out the music licens p.s does this mean those who are doign you tube vids with sing be affected?
amara01addis (1 day ago)
Idiots. Not Youtube, but the people here who blame Youtube. The PRS are bastards, to demand an extortionate license fee increase when youtube OWES them NOTHING is insulting. Youtube has done more for the music industry than any other single company. I understand license fees for copyrighted music. But the PRS license fee would mean Youtube lost money. For the people here who criticise them, ask yourself this. If you went on holiday abroad and a foreign stall owner tried to rip you off because you looked rich, would that be morally right? No it wouldn't. I can't be bothered with the internet anymore, too many retards.
SlashFirestorm (1 day ago)
Did you scrape your knees while you were down there, Google?
inkofdeath230 (1 day ago)
Moronic real life companies. The future is internet.
davidbcfc1 (1 day ago)
how much do PRS want? i mean how rich are google and even there saying its costs to much how is it fair the UK cant watch British artists but everyone else can, how is this fair?
AntiSmashX (1 day ago)
At least free music is being made, so the P.R.S. wouldn't get on their case. I say avoid radio stations, or any other company that plays music from now on, and just go to somewhere else, like keygenmusic(dot)net. They have the best free music availiable, and I respect the musicmakers deeply for their songs. Hopefully those artists will make more usage of the trackers already being made, including Modplug. TRACKER MUSIC RULES BIGTIME, and it's soon going to be the ONLY defense against the PRS, because it's actually free music made by generous users, instead of heartless record companies. You can block the fanbase, you can block the famous music, but you CANNOT block our imagination and ideas, because doing so is illegal anyways and would be filed as "harrassment" or "disturbing the peace". If more people resort to creating music to give away, the PRS would have already lost their game, and as a result, would leave many CD's just standing there on the future markets because of the dwindling fanbase of 2009. They have one, and I mean ONE LAST CHANCE to straighten up, otherwise this will happen to the big-shot companies paying celebrities to make music. So in conclusion, muting audio, is like muting freedom. Give them sound, or they'll be turnarounds that will impact the top companies. - AntiSmashX
loggeryvnv (1 day ago)
This is why bands like Radiohead and Enter Shikari are doing it for themselves, and why the PRS, record companies and ultimately sites like Youtube will all lose out in the end. With events like this happening more and more artists will go the route that Radiohead and all them did, and in the end there will be no cash for greedy fat cat corporations like Youtube and PRS to fight for in the first place.
korg440 (1 day ago)
PRS should pay youtube for showing their music to millions of viewers for free.
ryhillian (1 day ago)
P.R.S. as much as i support your goals. records,cass,cds,many of the major artist have been paid in triplict .without youtube/google new artist will never get the airplay that they need to reach a wider audience
Effylotte (1 day ago)
i think this is stupid and unfair why are we diffreny??? explain????
davejarvis (1 day ago)
bang on their Darthvadour, my mum owns a small barbers 3 of them turned up and said if she didn't pay 120 quid they would pass her debt onto a collection agency. Bullies thats all they are.
wendysprangers (1 day ago)
want videos viewing back in belgium
rottenseed (1 day ago)
whew...hopefully that'll get rid of that "Chocolate Rain" bs
DarthVapour08 (1 day ago)
The way around this is to use a proxy IP - Result.
ctwlittleboss (1 day ago)
Thank you PRS for standing up for songwriters who're being ripped off by all who think they can listen without paying. CTWard
DarthVapour08 (1 day ago)
Rubbish the PRS are a bunch of jumped up power hungry idiots. These are the same people that turn up mob handed using bully boy tatics towards tiny little firms who may play a radio for their staff. I for one applaud You Tube for telling them to get stuffed.
LittleOtherRecords (1 day ago)
ok, let me explain something to you all because you clearly know practically nothing about the way the music industry works. first of all, PRS is not one of the major record companies that youtube are so proud to boast of their "strong partnerships" with. PRS is not a record company at all, it is a non-profit organisation that collects royalties on behalf of songwriters. all sognwriters, whether they have a record deal or not - so the people that youtube are taking revenue away from here, the people most affected, will generally be the poorest songwriters at the bottom of the pile. PRS is simply tryin to protect songwriters. Google is trying to protect its profit margin. PRS have not asked youtube to take any videos down and nothing requires them by any law to do so - it is a simple act of defiance, a show of power, a way of saying to PRS (in the middle of negotiations, remember) - we are bigger than you, and richer than you , and more powerful than you ,and we can walk all over you. if google/youtube win this battle it could, quite literally, mean the end of anyone apart from th super rich being able to make a living writing music. simple as that. to support youtube/google in this battle is to support a giant corporation against ordinary struggling songwriters.
SaiLoRXXMoOnXX (1 day ago)
thanks YT so annoying!!!! really hate you!
jezzy240 (1 day ago)
this needs to be sorted out for the sake of music fans get your finger out and fix this
Why4USay (1 day ago)
Just read some more posts. Get this right, it's PRS that are the bad guys here. NOT YouTube. They are trying to keep within the law but face huge bills/fines/penalties if they break it. I don't see that they have a choice.
backos (1 day ago)
stop paying prs kill all videos.. and music.. send them to 60s and take the rights directly for the producers and musicians individual
Why4USay (1 day ago)
For years my staff used to bring in CDs for us all to enjoy. We used to buy 8-10 CDs per month because of this. Then PRS stepped in and said we had to have a licence to do this. We stopped and stopped buying. Prats. BTW, I've been a musician for 40 years and they've not helped me one bit!
RandomRSstuffOmg (1 day ago)
DIE!
Micha499 (1 day ago)
Booo!
bengreengiant (1 day ago)
Fucking hate the performing rights society they are fucking donkey raping pieces of shit. They should stop licking lawyers assholes and become proper human. FUCK YOU PRS!!!!!
theestranger (1 day ago)
PRS is claiming Google wants to pay LESS than what it's paying now... This is just another example of why artists should avoid signing with major labels.
tsjoencinema (1 day ago)
Had it not been for Youtube, I would not have bought many music cd's. The corporations and those who represent artists don't understand that Youtube is doing them a favour.
Sideways99 (1 day ago)
unsurprisingly, people commenting on youtube have no clue as to what they are talking about.
AhojeQ (1 day ago)
hey youtubers, check out my vids.. ahojeq :D
amnistic45 (1 day ago)
Ok, another company to add to my hate list. Steve Porter, you have been listed! Youtube, you are doing well. I am rooting for you!
UpDownMostly (1 day ago)
The music industry doesn't get it and hasn't for some time. The monolithic model of the past is over. Everyone knows artists should be compensated. The old ways don't work any more. Figure out a new way or you're going to lose in the end game.
IAmTheRandomKid (1 day ago)
PRS always go over the limit. Once, they fined a mechanic for using his radio when he was working by himself. Now that is being tightassed
xzp58 (1 day ago)
90% my favourites gone,I tend to watch country from US. CMT are perfect example of this all videos restricted outside US,If i cannot see artist performing then dont buy the cd or dvd. PRS shooting themselves in foot. Maybe a little give and take on each side and some commonsence my help
andymerrett (1 day ago)
Hey, that's OK YouTube. We'll just watch the illegal copies that are littered around your site, and then laugh when you're sued by the record labels who you could've cut a deal with. Nice to know YouTube values its UK users. And to think I stuck up for you in the face of your Viacom lawsuit in the past. YouTube isn't even the best video hosting site any more. I'm very likely to go and use one of your competitors' sites from now on, and I hope a lot of other people do too.
X61t (1 day ago)
Well done YouTube! :)
revelation1965 (2 days ago)
Maybe it is time to go back to when there was no content just a web page. What is the purpose of having flash and all other types of software to enahnce your internet experience if it is going to be taken away. Greed is Greed I do respect the artist point of view but again why just get rid of all media content and just go back to the roots of the internet.
r3loaded2k8 (2 days ago)
The PRS are possibly the most retarded organisation ever - even more so than the record labels. They even walk in to corner shops where the owner is just listening to the radio and demand "royalty fees" just because it's being played at a business. They also do this "on behalf" of the artists even if the artists never requested them to do so. Music videos are effectively adverts for songs, and the artists behind them, and I don't see why YouTube should have to pay to carry an advert - if anything, YOU should be charging THEM to carry their music videos (with additional perks over ordinary videos ofc). Max exposure = max sales. Google/YouTube, stand up for what is right for your consumers! Fight them back!
bizkits14 (2 days ago)
I believe this is stupid! And i totally understand why Google do not what to pay. The PRS are being idiots - prime example, I came across a video on YouTube that had Remedy by Seether playing as background music - I enjoyed the song that much, I bought it on iTunes, and then i bought the album!!! If I had not of heard the song on YouTube then I wouldnt of bought the album! PRS are shooting the enjoyment of music in the head - and I hate them!!
Jenzzyuk (2 days ago)
I think you need to sort this Problem out asap because I will miss Watching Music Videos if you dont Solve it quickly so please be quick as you can?
andeoc (2 days ago)
www.muzu.tv has all the videos and is totally dedicated to music it pays the artists a fair reward for their work
aewanko300 (2 days ago)
"The music industry is killing music!" True. And YouTube is reinforcing this.
cartooner2008 (2 days ago)
Good thing I don't live in the UK. I hope you guys sort this out and let music videos be seen in the UK again, otherwise, you'll lose quite a lot of your UK users.
laniwilliamson (2 days ago)
YouTube is the only chance I have to hear and see stuff from the UK. So please come to decision very soon
Flint2007 (2 days ago)
I can't make amvs anymore thanks to these rules. >_>
fripp2002 (2 days ago)
And they wonder why we download our music free? lol...
clarissal (2 days ago)
Something needs to be done about PRS, they are an absolute joke. I agree with everyone else, most people use YouTube to listen to music and I know that I have found a lot of bands through here which has led to me buying their albums. Which I wouldn't have done if I hadn't heard them on here.
Doug52392 (2 days ago)
YouTube, all your shitty "Content ID" tools do is harm legitimate users of your website. These unjust acts of censorship in the name of big business is violating § 107, Title 17, U.S.C. http://tinyurl.com/WMG-Funeral <-- YouTube even censors fucking funerals of Marines who died fighting for FREEDOM.
Doug52392 (2 days ago)
YouTube, all your shitty "Content ID" tools do is harm legitimate users of your website. http://img5.imageshack.us/img5 /5656/youtubefuneralwmg.jpg How the fuck do you justify censoring videos like this as the "right" thing to do? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =mvg4n8Txgdc Yeah, real nice YouTube. These unjust acts of censorship in the name of big business is violating § 107, Title 17, U.S.C. (Fair Use). I have been in contact with numerous lawyers, they all insist your breaking the law.
hypercatjohn (2 days ago)
Shooting themselves in the foot, FREE advertising for music, who'd want to download the rubbish sound quality versions off this site? I've found countless oldskool jungle records I've bought on vinyl because of youtube, get a grip!
gadget348 (2 days ago)
Winston Churchill died in 1965, if he'd written Vera Lynn's "We'll Meet Again" in 1939 instead of leading Britain to war his estate would still be being paid by the PRS in 2015. Is it me or are our priorities a little mixed up?
DanJ1984 (2 days ago)
Bysectrix of course Youtube lose out if their users cannot watch music videos. I spend 90% of my time on Youtube listening to music and the same can be said about my family and friends. It is in the best interests of everyone to get this sorted. Youtube know as well as anyone that if users cannot get what they want here they will go elsewhere. PRS must know that a little of something is worth more then a lot of nothing.
Thorpe (2 days ago)
That sucks.
Bysectrix (2 days ago)
No UK vids,oh what a shame.How will i ever survive. The PRS should be paying You Tube for advertising there music not the other way around.I find and buy music on You Tube as i dont listen to all the mass produced rot they play on radio so if its not on You Tube then i dont buy it.So who`s losing out,certainly not You Tube.
TheCocktailBar (2 days ago)
I can live with this, at the end of the day youtube is a business and needs to be treat as such. You will get no complaints from me, thanks
HOOYANOE (2 days ago)
Could you agree with sponsors or advertisers and the authors/rights-owners of major labels one-off payments for these "new-release", "premium" releases? One by one, they will all become competitive and keen to have the exposure and whatever income can be generated: A rate will "emerge" which is the compromise, acceptable to the royalty collectors and affordable to You Tube. Older stuff could be seen as "promotional exposure" for artists and songwriters which keep their professional profiles high. People's videos of concerts often act as a stimulus for future concert ticket sales... You Tube ought to be charging the artists !
hadron28 (2 days ago)
Another VICTORY for piracy.
gadget348 (2 days ago)
Who gets the money the PRS collect for dead composers - who else deserves to earn it? A widow perhaps? But for fifty years after a composers death sombody gets paid. If you lay down your life for your country you wont get a deal anywhere as good as this. What has the composer done to get such public respect?
greyknickers2009 (2 days ago)
Well, this was already happening, but now it has taken songs that we listen to through the channel that actually have music on here "legally" away, so I think many of us, ain't too happy with the PRS or Youtube, well you guys truly do like to screw us UK ppl. Thanks a lot Youtube.
punkchyaz (2 days ago)
Surely the amount of money Youtube will lose out on from advertising is more than what it would cost to renew the license? I know that might sound daft, but I would estimate that about 70% of users come to Youtube to listen to music. Surely there was a way around it?
partypingu (2 days ago)
This is a fairly standard response of officious bodies when something they control becomes popular, bump up the license costs. The same approach has already robbed us of Pandora and, now youtube videos. The music rights holders need to start figuring out that providing maximum exposure to music is the best way of selling it!
Yartek (2 days ago)
I have no respect at all for the PRS. Just because I play music on an MP3 player in my workplace that I have already legally bought, they demanded over £120 a year in dubious fees because a customer might hear a song they hadn't paid for. There's no way of telling if the fees I was forced to pay even go to any of the artists I play. WIth this it's obvious the PRS aren't bothered about the artists, but in being greedy jobsworths who are actually getting in the way of artists' work being heard.
gadget348 (2 days ago)
I bought more cd's after finding obscure stuff on youtube last year than I have done in the last twenty years. Youtube should be charging the PRS for its advertising, As should the BBC and other advert free organisations who play music.
Allinred (2 days ago)
Trust the UK to get embroiled in this. The music industry here is a joke. It sucks that this is happening, but I support Youtube's decision.
GabrielMetcalf (2 days ago)
I want to cry.... When you say Premium videos? What exactly is going to be blocked?
sa2572 (2 days ago)
Welcome to the UK. Living like it was still 1960. Publicly funded television and an outdated music industry (although not entirely unique). This is a country that shut down a television on-demand site (Kangaroo) because of competition, when no such site is currently operating and prohibitive costs mean no such site will operate - there are no other providers that would have been shafted!!
Slyth66 (2 days ago)
Why are you people criticizing YouTube for this? It's not their fault! They are doing what they have to do to prevent any law suits against them, and protecting the users as well. Yes, I think was PRS is trying to do is insanely unfair. But YouTube cannot control that. You are lucky they are willing to share this info with us. Thank you Patrick,. I appreciate you and your team's effort in this situation.
picceta1 (2 days ago)
Wow PRS are fags!
weaselthree (2 days ago)
This all comes down to greed and when it comes to greed the US is number 1 in the world.Warner has deleted all their music here and now Yutube/Google will not pay a dime so other music can stay here. You see Patrick says they are proud of their ID content tool that they can use to remove historic important music videos,my God I feel sick. Suppose in a few years time there will only be videos here that show what freaks do with themselves in bed at night.
KOHPelord (2 days ago)
The cost is even too high for Google? That's a bit difficult to believe... better kick up your advertising to those who are willing.
Yukikolovesdarkmousy (2 days ago)
go on strike and refuse to play music videos to the usa too, youtube. i dare you =___=
lilmookie (2 days ago)
Once again the music industry is on the cutting edge of technology in music promotion.
stifflol (2 days ago)
The music industry is killing music!
timesnewroman (2 days ago)
I suspect there's a bit of right and a bit of wrong in both your stances. Why don't you consider adopting a less macho posture and sit down and try to sort out a mutually acceptable conclusion. I'd hate to think I'd miss out on discovering interesting new talent, which until now I have done. Go on be adults give and take, you know it makes sense.
rbonesonline (2 days ago)
I love how they've shot themselves in the foot, and are trying to make it look like Google has made a rash and unreasonable decision. "Google had revenues of $5.7bn in the last quarter of 2008." So, I can see what they (PRS) are trying to do there, but it's not really relevant, is it? Should Microsoft sell Windows 7 for £10 simply because they made $Xbn in Q4 2008?
RichardJoslin83 (2 days ago)
YOUTUBE. ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWER.
pickassoreborn (2 days ago)
Well, there go my animated music video playlists. It's been fun, YouTube, but obviously the music industry is ultimately more powerful and don't particularly care for promoting music in the UK. A sad day.
evilevilevil4 (2 days ago)
This sucks. YouTube, you used to stand for something but now you've become something lesser.
zetros (2 days ago)
Damn...those damn bourgeoisie music bosses who oppress the people who want to listen to music!
mostwantedsongs (2 days ago)
''For example, there may be several different copyrights in a single music video, controlled by different organizations with different interests.'' WRONG!! The music industry has only one interest: get as much money as possible without doing anything. Keep downloading music and make copyright issues like this belong to the past as soon as possible.
leemoochinjarvis (2 days ago)
Very sad news indeed. It's a real shame that an agreement couldn't be reached - online videos can be a fantastic marketing tool for many music 2.0 savvy artists and musicians.
bernicemcdonnell (2 days ago)
Such a dissapointment, I thought YouTube was better that this!
ChurchHatesTucker (2 days ago)
And you're going to pursue false claims, fair use exemptions, etc., right?
TornHamstringUnited (2 days ago)
Very sad news, very disappointing YouTube! You are not helping anyone by holding the PRS to ransom like this, please reconsider your move, as there are plenty of UK users who will miss out. And also, you are now encouraging users to copy videos and post them on your site.. People will still find a way to watch the videos. Very sad :(
davemee (2 days ago)
PRS: still living in a geographic internet? Welcome to 1970!
primative276 (2 days ago)
surely when you make billions of dollars a year from advertising you can afford this... nothing but greed, thanks for dissapointing all your UK users